View Message

I think Rutherford sounds ridiculously pretentious and Kester could be kind cool as a mn if it has some family significance or personal meaning but I think it sounds kind of creepy as a fn. Probably because it reminds me of Lester- and I always think Lester the Molester. Actually now I am thinking Kester the molester as well. So scratch that. Yuck.

I find both really unattractive, sorry. They're way too surnamey, Kester's very trendy and I'm pretty sure Rutherford is connected to something to do with chemistry.

Rutherford is very pretentious and surname-y but I have a soft spot for pretentious names. I quite like it actually. I wouldn't use it myself but would love to meet someone with that name. Kester also looks a bit surname-y but when I looked it up in the database it turned out to be a legit form of Cristopher which definitely makes me like it more. I'm not fond of the sound though but it's absolutely usable.

---