[Opinions] I missed the part
in reply to a message by molly
where Austin and Evan are unisex names. :PTo me they're both all male.Had I encountered this set on my own, I would misidentify the sex of the second child based on the fn. Also, I would usually assume Austin on a girl to be a familial surname used as a mn, though given the other details that may not be the case here.Apart from all of that, though, I do see your point about balance, word names, common, uncommon, unisex, and I agree in theory that those characteristics are well used here. All four of these names are actually on my PNL right now. I just don't like these specific names being used in this specific way.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Neat twin set  ·  molly  ·  6/5/2009, 5:13 AM
I dislike it.  ·  Lovely  ·  6/5/2009, 5:08 PM
Re: Neat twin set  ·  Shaymin  ·  6/5/2009, 3:32 PM
Re: Neat twin set  ·  Joan-Ay  ·  6/5/2009, 9:21 AM
Re: Neat twin set  ·  Julindsy  ·  6/5/2009, 9:08 AM
I missed the part  ·  Lillian  ·  6/5/2009, 8:33 AM
Re: Neat twin set  ·  Murasaki  ·  6/5/2009, 5:45 AM
Re: Neat twin set  ·  Llewella  ·  6/5/2009, 5:30 AM
Re: Neat twin set  ·  Cristina_es  ·  6/5/2009, 5:14 AM