View Message
New Post
Search
Help[Games] Umm...did you use the database? This isn't 2009, it's 1880.
10/16/2009, 1:48 PM
in reply to a message by Smiles(:
I don't understand why Kimberly or Connor would be there. The database is the top 1000 for the 1880s. You can get it on this website or on the Social Security Administration's website.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Messages
Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · Anthroponomastics · 10/15/2009, 5:15 PM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · christinaxo · 10/17/2009, 9:17 AM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · bananarama · 10/16/2009, 12:36 PM
•Umm...did you use the database? This isn't 2009, it's 1880. · Anthroponomastics · 10/16/2009, 1:48 PM
•I decided to let Kimberly and Connor slide as family names. · Anthroponomastics · 10/17/2009, 6:20 PM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · miss_smiley · 10/16/2009, 7:56 AM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · Wandering Moon · 10/16/2009, 6:45 AM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · Wandering Moon · 10/16/2009, 6:45 AM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · Aderyn Azula · 10/15/2009, 8:38 PM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · Rachel Dianne · 10/15/2009, 7:16 PM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · gabriellagrace · 10/15/2009, 6:47 PM
•Re: Jane's 129-year Generational Congrats: Sign-ups and round 1 · Rachel Shaina · 10/15/2009, 6:47 PM