View Message

I keep thinking of the Mask movie with Jim Carrey.

I think Loki would make an awesome and unexpected middle name. :]

It recently got added to my "middle name only" list, too. :)

From what I read, Loki was never a purely evil or destructive character in Norse mythology proper (he was just Loki, a hero, a villain, a trickster, the helper of gods and pain in their...posteriors... possibly a bit of a law unto himself but certainly not a force of evil or the "big bad" of the myths. He even saved the day a couple of times. I mean, Loka Táttur, right?), until the Christians (I'm sorry, but historical Christians were fond of this kind of dirty trick and ethnic bullying to their own ends, and either way tended to have this effect... it might not be the same today, but...) hijacked the myth and got their claws in upon which he was seriously maligned and transformed into more of a evil / devil-equivalent character, eventually resulting in the surviving and prevailing ideas of him. I mean, it's hard to think of a Norse god who wasn't a bit of a git at times, so Loki was about par for the course, but even though he was always a bit of a cunning little sod, there's a lot of proof that Norse society never saw him as evil and that maligning happened later.

---

Okay, rant over, but I don't agree with the whole mentality of Loki being a 'terrible god' as it's a pretty strong example of 'Hijacked by Jesus' and ethnocentric / historical stupidity.

---

And so, to be honest, I've always found Loki to be an interesting god as is, and I don't find many arguments for it being a name with a bad connotation, especially nowadays when there might be some poor people out there who have never even heard of the mythological character. I like the sound. I like the meaning. It's spunky, a little edgy, fascinating and unusual and yet not trendy or made up. I've known many, many kitties named Loki, so I think it's a really rather common cat name, but I've never understood why it's not used on people as well, so I'd say go with it! :)

---

And honestly, I think that mn is better, but fn, if spectacularly well thought out and balanced with the (perceived) character of a character or theoretical child, their middle name and surname, could be acceptable too. I won't say that it might not lead to a little teasing, but then I couldn't bet on it either.

This message was edited 6/19/2011, 9:39 AM

my dad had a dog named Loki, but i like the name.
He's seen more of a trickster in what I've read, but haven't read as much on Nordic mythologies as Greek.

---

I like it, I know of someone who used it as a first name for her son and it's is really cool, especially with the rest of the sibset.

A lot of people associate Loki / Loke with evilness here, and that's one of the reasons I wouldn't use it. Perhaps the association isn't as strong in other countries though.

---

That said, I think Loki is a little more interesting than Loke.
Loke is the most common one here in Sweden. There is a total of 7 boys with the name Loki, and 5 of them has Loki as their FN.

---

There is a total of 1815 boys names Loke, 1279 of them has it as their FN. And Loke has been in the Swedish top 100 since 2004, so obviously not everyone associate it with evilness. But I still prefer Loki / Loke on a dog, instead of a child. :P

This message was edited 6/19/2011, 6:42 AM