View Message

New Post
Search
Help
[Opinions] no go...
by RoxStar
7/10/2012, 9:10 AM
in reply to a message by Chelsea
It has been done, but it never really caught on and it is now firmly a girls' name. Shannon on a boy seems dated, even more so than Shannon, which is very much a seventies/eighties name.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Chelsea  ·  7/10/2012, 8:21 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  abbasdaughter  ·  7/10/2012, 7:04 PM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Lily  ·  7/10/2012, 6:27 PM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Teacups  ·  7/10/2012, 5:27 PM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Rachel Shaina  ·  7/10/2012, 2:34 PM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  humblebee  ·  7/10/2012, 11:34 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Billina  ·  7/10/2012, 9:26 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  queenv  ·  7/10/2012, 9:15 AM
•no go...  ·  RoxStar  ·  7/10/2012, 9:10 AM
•Re: no go...  ·  Llewella  ·  7/10/2012, 9:14 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Llewella  ·  7/10/2012, 8:49 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  queenv  ·  7/10/2012, 9:49 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  Llewella  ·  7/10/2012, 11:24 AM
•Re: Shannon (for a boy)  ·  xPrincess27x  ·  7/10/2012, 8:35 AM