New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Michaela
in reply to a message by queenv
I don't like either of those names, but upon reflection they seem more I don't know, logical? as feminine versions of Paul and Robert. Same way that Michelle seems more "logical" as a femininization of Michael, even though it's more elaborated and Frenchified.
Still reflecting, if you really want to delve into it, Charlesetta would be the more literal feminization (damn, that is not an easy word to type) of Charles, but it's so obvious it grosses me out. Charlene and Charlotte are more elaborated, but seem more "logical" to me. Carla too, though again if you want to nitpick it's more directly a feminization of Carl. *shrug* I guess this is a case where it's better not to overthink it.
Still reflecting, if you really want to delve into it, Charlesetta would be the more literal feminization (damn, that is not an easy word to type) of Charles, but it's so obvious it grosses me out. Charlene and Charlotte are more elaborated, but seem more "logical" to me. Carla too, though again if you want to nitpick it's more directly a feminization of Carl. *shrug* I guess this is a case where it's better not to overthink it.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1