View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Canaan
No. I would not. Mostly because I am not into place names, but also because I think it is not really that attractive as a name. Plus, I have never understood the appropriation of Biblical locations as monikers. There are so many bold and influential characters in the Bible / Pentateuch, even ones with unusual names for today, that I think there are better choices out there. ______________________________________________
"How wonderful it is that no one need wait a single moment before starting to improve upon the world." -Ann Frank
Mama to my "bright star" Clarisse Bituin and Wife to Julius. Mahal na mahal from our little family to yours!
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

The database entry says it is a person's name in the bible.
vote up1
Hunh. I didn't look it up before I posted. I didn't know the tidbit about Ham, but I sometimes skim genealogies. It totally makes sense. I guess if I think about it, most place names in the Bible are also the name of people from the Genesis and Exodus account. I would still consider it a place name over a person's name though. Like Eden or Israel. Yeah, there are people with the name, but they are predominantly linked to a place.
vote up1