View Message

there are plenty of "horribly unattractive" names that have been regularly used as first names, though. It's all subjective. I happen to think the name Cleveland is horribly unattractive but if someone wanted to use it to honor Grover Cleveland who am I to say Cleveland should stay out of sight in the middle? Maybe they felt that Spurgeon wouldn't be prominent enough, and therefore wouldn't convey their want to honor, if they had relegated it to the middle. Maybe they planned to call him Spurgeon but once he arrived they couldn't part with Quincy

---