New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] In defense of the character...
in reply to a message by Anneza
"I don't much admire the Shakespeare character - the whole tragedy could have been avoided if she'd only put common courtesy above her own tight little identity..."
The reason she was disinherited was not that she eschewed "common courtesy," but because she refused to take advantage of her father's growing dementia. Cordelia, Kent / Caius, and the Fool are the only characters willing to stand up to Lear and tell it like it is, and the first two suffer retaliation only because they are outnumbered by either active manipulators (Goneril, Regan & Co.) or enablers too afraid to say or do anything. So basically, the case of the tragedy is her own genuine, filial love for her father.
Please rate my personal name lists:
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/109399
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/91835
http://greens-end.myminicity.com
The reason she was disinherited was not that she eschewed "common courtesy," but because she refused to take advantage of her father's growing dementia. Cordelia, Kent / Caius, and the Fool are the only characters willing to stand up to Lear and tell it like it is, and the first two suffer retaliation only because they are outnumbered by either active manipulators (Goneril, Regan & Co.) or enablers too afraid to say or do anything. So basically, the case of the tragedy is her own genuine, filial love for her father.
Please rate my personal name lists:
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/109399
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/91835
http://greens-end.myminicity.com
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1