View Message

[Opinions] Friend's BA!
The sister and brother-in-law of an old friend from high school recently welcomed a baby girl named...Kennedy Rose.WDYT? I personally think my friend's sister could've done better in the mn department (filler), but overall, it's a sweet combo.Rate my PNLs!
Boys: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/148673
Girls: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/148673/111868
MN only: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/148673/112002Top: Jordan & April
Bottom: Jarrett & Charla
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I really dislike Kennedy; I don't even much like it as a last name.
Kennedy Rose sounds like the parents were among those people in the early sixties who fell head over heels for the whole Kennedy/Camelot mystique/personality cult and named her after the matriarch of that clan. The sad thing is, I'd be willing to bet a fair amount of money these particular parents were totally unaware of Rose Kennedy.
vote up1
Hi !!!Rose could be a lovely name but it is so overused that now it is a very filler name.Kennedy is awful on a girl. It is also bad for a boy because it is an 'important surname' but it could work because it is the name of an ancient Irish king.Byeeeeeee
vote up1
Kennedy Rose, eh? Why not just use Rose Kennedy and be done with it?I really don't get the fashion for presidential lnfns. Say this for Donald Trump: it's not likely we'll see hundreds of little Trumps running around in a few years time!
vote up1
Interesting articlehttp://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/06/nobody-names-their-baby-barack-anymore/326408/I have a niece named Kennedy but it's a family surname. It was the maiden name of brother's-in-law mother. He used it to honor her. I think Judith would have been better but Kennedy is also a family name on my husband's side. It raised a LOT of eyebrows when they used it.
vote up1
Interesting, indeed - thank you!I'm a bit puzzled by a couple of things, though. Did they really count babies who were named Jimmy during the Carter presidency? What happened to James? And, indeed, to Carter! They seem to be focusing on given names rather than surnames, which is fine for Roosevelt and Eisenhower (I hope!) but not for Reagan, Carter and Clinton.And I've also started wondering: would it be worse to be an atheist named Christian or a Bernie Sanders supporter named Reagan?
vote up1
for that matter ...I doubt there'll be any Baracks or Obamas either, or at least not enough to make any kind of impact statistically.
vote up1
I don't care for Kennedy, especially on a girl. Rose I think is nice whether in the first or middle spot. It's kind of timeless.
vote up1
I like Rose even despite it being a complete filler name. I believe Rose is a lovely classic name.Kennedy I don't like especially on a girl. Kennedy is a masculine surname. I much prefer it either on a male or as a surname
vote up1