New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: The point...
in reply to a message by Sabrina Fair
I'm astonished that you can be as old as you claim you are in your profile, and yet not realise that naming siblings after the protagonists in tragic love & sex stories is something that you just don't do. Quite apart from the fact that EVERYONE will think of the story when they hear those names, can you imagine being in high school when the class learns about Romeo & Juliet or Arthur & Guinevere? Would *you* like to go through school being teased with the epithet "Ha ha, you f***ed your brother!" ? Would you? Because that's the kind of thing kids say. That's probably the *mildest* of the things they'd say.
Life is tough enough on kids without them being tagged with a name that brings up completely inappropriate associations when placed next to a sibling's name.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Life is tough enough on kids without them being tagged with a name that brings up completely inappropriate associations when placed next to a sibling's name.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
I honestly would mind. sure I know where the names came from, obviously, but maybe I was just raised differently than most people. If my name was Juliet, and my brother's name was Romeo, I'd probably just think my mother really loved both those names, or the story or something, if people said nasty things about me, and him that's thier problem, if they want to be weird and perverted it's thier buisness. I wouldn't think it was incestous that's going a bit far. Children get teasted regardless of anything, yes they might get teasted a bit more, but I'd teach them respect about thier own names, and how perverted people are now a days. I try not to think drity minded [as most kids do now a days]..i'm not saying you...i mean in general. I don't look at them as "sex stories", but yes romantic tales, and yeah they were tragic but it's only a story. I coulnd't use Juliet anways if I wanted to my niece is Julia, I'd defenitly use Romeo though. :)
I understand how people could get think wrong impression, buit to call it incestious I think is evil.
"There is none Holy like The Lord, there is none besides Thee; there is no Rock like our God." (1 Samuel 2:2 RSV)
I understand how people could get think wrong impression, buit to call it incestious I think is evil.
"There is none Holy like The Lord, there is none besides Thee; there is no Rock like our God." (1 Samuel 2:2 RSV)
This message was edited 4/4/2006, 4:16 PM
1
You seem to be in complete denial about this subject, and I'm not going to waste much time trying to convince you - if you're still immature enough to call sex "dirty" and "perverted" then it'll be a long time before you have kids anyway.
But rest assured, those stories are about SEX and since that's all teenage boys think about, your children would be verbally tortured because of your stubborn refusal to face facts.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
But rest assured, those stories are about SEX and since that's all teenage boys think about, your children would be verbally tortured because of your stubborn refusal to face facts.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
1
Excuse me? I am mature. I am not in denial, I said I know people would think of those ways, but i'm Christian, I try not thinking that way. By means of "dirty" im not talking about sex in itself, because that's not dirty/perverted, but to think something was incetious IS pervert and dirty, when it's just two children named whatever the parents named them. I know the story well, I love Romeo & Juilet the play, but I see it more then just a 'sex' story, it goes much more then that, obviously many can't see that.
If you want me to be perverted like the rest of the world, then i'm sorry but your not going to get me to think that by seeing the names Romeo and Juliet or Tristan and Isolde that would be incestious together. That's just wrong. Yes they were lovers (there's more to lovers then just sex, there's a difference between love and lust), besides the story isnt even about sex, but it's not like it happend for real, maybe if it did i'd change my mind.
I DO see your point, but I still don't think naming them that is "bad", it may be a little odd in itself. Yes teasing potential would be more, but I do not think it's incestious.
"There is none Holy like The Lord, there is none besides Thee; there is no Rock like our God." (1 Samuel 2:2 RSV)
If you want me to be perverted like the rest of the world, then i'm sorry but your not going to get me to think that by seeing the names Romeo and Juliet or Tristan and Isolde that would be incestious together. That's just wrong. Yes they were lovers (there's more to lovers then just sex, there's a difference between love and lust), besides the story isnt even about sex, but it's not like it happend for real, maybe if it did i'd change my mind.
I DO see your point, but I still don't think naming them that is "bad", it may be a little odd in itself. Yes teasing potential would be more, but I do not think it's incestious.
"There is none Holy like The Lord, there is none besides Thee; there is no Rock like our God." (1 Samuel 2:2 RSV)
This message was edited 4/4/2006, 6:17 PM
1
I agree.
I also have to say that if I met IRL sibling set named Romeo and Juleit/Lancelot and Guinevere/Guinevere and Arthur/etc I wouldn't stop laughing.
I also have to say that if I met IRL sibling set named Romeo and Juleit/Lancelot and Guinevere/Guinevere and Arthur/etc I wouldn't stop laughing.
1