View Message

[Opinions] Foster for a girl
Just simply tell me what you think please. I like it personally.♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧♡*+:•*∴”:♡.•♬✧
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up2

Replies

Awful. On boys too.
vote up1
Horrid. Reminds me of foster care.
vote up1
Noooo. I don't like it for either a boy or girl.
vote up1
I agree with what most people seem to think. Foster isn't the best name for a girl. Sorry...
vote up1
Sorry, but I hate it on just about every level. I hate surnames as first names to begin with, as I think it’s a trend that’s going to sound very dated in the future. But I especially hate them on girls.But more than that, the name is loaded with the idea of a kid whose family can’t care for them for various reasons (death, being unfit), and who gets shuffled from place to place. Many kids do just fine, but the system often leads to neglect, abuse, self-esteem issues, and acting out.
vote up1
It's bad enough for a male. It's ugly looking and sounding, and also the Swedish word for 'fetus'. Using it on a girl makes it a hundred times worse.
vote up1
A foster daughter is one thing; a Foster daughter is quite another. Avoid!
vote up1
Hi !!!If it is honouring so use it without any doubt. Being a surname it is unisex.Personally I much prefer Forest to it (but I dislike Forester). I dislike the link with foster children like any other person. The other two occupational meanings of Foster don't bother me.
vote up1
Don't like it for a girl or boy
vote up1
I don’t like it for boys either to be honest, reminds me of foster as in foster parents etc.
vote up1
About as dumb and ugly you can get for a girl. Still dumb on a boy. Foster? Really? But on a girl? It’s simply hideous.
vote up1
Horrible for a girl.
vote up1
Oh, no, no, no, I don't like it at all. I don't love it for a boy but this is honestly one of the least suited boy names for girls I've ever heard suggested. Some names should not be unisex and this is one of them.
vote up1
I wholly dislike it.noel had some nice suggestions below! I'd also suggest Esther/Ester, Steren, or Faustine.
vote up1
I can't disassociate it from the word; it's too commonly used, so it seems almost like naming a kid Nurture or Orphan. I think Prosper or Fausta would be better.

This message was edited 9/12/2019, 7:35 PM

vote up1
I don't think it's good. Sorry ... I can see the appeal of how it sounds, sort of crisp and soft. It wouldn't shock me to see it used - it's not "that" bad. But to me it seems like it should be GP material.I personally wouldn't like it, just because I don't generally care for the style (surname). That doesn't make it bad. But I like very few girl names in this style - Hunter is the only one that comes to mind straightaway.The dictionary word has connotations (foster child). Not totally negative, but not shiny either. That's the main thing I think makes it less than great.And the surname has associations, too: Fosters is a beer - "Fosters is Australian for 'beer'!" so the ads said.
Fosters Freeze, Foster & Smith, Foster & Lloyd - it seems catchy and trademarky.
And it sounds a tiny bit like "faster" ... gets a D- on the 'boom boom test.'
The pleasing sound doesn't compensate for all that. When I add it all up, the score is negative, in my view.
vote up1
I honestly don’t even like it for a boy.
vote up1