View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: We've all exchanged terrible twin names, so how about . . .
Lydia and Cassie, of course. I think that's a really nice pair. Hmm...I know a Jeff and Josh, but that's not good, because they're identical, and hardly anyone can tell them apart.I know a Richard and Robert, and they're called Ricky and Rob. Surprisingly enough, it works well, because they don't look anything alike. It's easy to tell them apart, and the similarity of their names kind of reinforces the fact that they are, in fact, twins. (They have a common last name, so that fact alone doesn't give it away.) I think that's really interesting--the fact that their names are similar benefits them, rather than detracting from them.My mom's cousins just had twins (a boy and a girl) and their names are Trevor and Kendall. Now, I don't like Kendall at all on a girl, but I do have to commend them on picking names that aren't too twinny. Of course, I think they sound really bizarre together, but I think that they almost work--and I'd like it, if I could stomach Kendall. Heh.I can't really think of any other twins I know. There's another set in my youngest sister's grade, and one is Hayley, but I can't for the life of me remember her sister!Array
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

No replies