View Message

[Opinions] Marguerite, nickname Margot (but she's not French)
Does the nickname Margot for Marguerite work outside of Francophone places, or is it "trying too hard?"***Please rate my personal name lists:www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/117507
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/109399
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/132018

This message was edited 4/22/2024, 7:48 AM

vote up2

Replies

I like it in theory, but I agree with the other comments that Margot feels very deliberate and a little archaic. Margo would feel a lot more natural, because it seems more like an intuitive "first syllable + vowel" nickname.
vote up2
It doesn't even work in francophone places anymore.Margot may come from Marguerite, but is an independent name now and used as such. To me it feels like naming her Mary and using Molly as a nickname. Unnecessary and confusing, even though it does have a history.Why not just use Margot? It works. My favorite spelling is Margaux.

This message was edited 4/23/2024, 2:02 PM

vote up2
I've refrained from specifying in the OP and to other responses, but for some personal reasons Margot as a legal name is unusable for me, even though I enjoy it. (Long story short: somebody I don't get along with.) That's why I was looking for a workaround. :-PI've tried to get on the Margaux bandwagon, but it just... sorry, it's trying too hard to be cool. Yes, it's a real place, I know, but it's a bit much.
vote up1
I did not know about this connection. It’s not intuitive to me, so no.I have been pondering what nickname to use for Marguerite as it’s one of my favorite names, but I haven’t found a satisfying answer yet.
vote up2
Well, it worked in the early 20th century in the UK, because the two most famous British Margots of that era, Margot Asquith (1864-1945) and the ballerina Margot Fonteyn (1919-1991) were both born as Margaret.

This message was edited 4/24/2024, 8:07 PM

vote up2
Er ... that would be 1991! Fonteyn's given names were Margaret Evelyn, which seem more like 1930s names than 19teens.
vote up1
Sorry. Will correct.
vote up1
Worry not - typos happen to the best of us!
vote up1
Yeah, I don't see why not.
vote up1
Why not? It's a standard nic, like Elize for Elizabeth. But since they're both used as independent names, I'd be inclined to just use Margot. It hasn't got the spelling and pronunciation issues that Marguerite has. I knew an English-speaking Margot who must be in her 80s by now; I also got chatting to a little girl at a sports meeting once: she was Afrikaans, and told me that her name was Margot. She pronounced it, and so did her parents of course, maR XHOT, where XH is the throat-clearing sound. But she was actually always called Margotjie, which sounds like mar XHOI key.
vote up1
I would argue Margot does have the spelling and pronunciation issues. For one, Margo and Margueax are both also popular. For two, Margot looks like it should have a T sound on the end. I pronounced it that way up until Margot Robbie appeared.
vote up1
I think it does work, just like Margo functions as a short form of Margaret.
vote up1
Does it happen in Francophone places? I don't even know, but it seems like Matilda "Maud" or Sarah "Sally" would to me...someone could do it, but I think of them as separate names.
vote up2
I say it still works. The association is there. And historically it was the traditional nickname for Marguerite. For example, Marguerite de Valois, first wife of Henri IV lived in the late 16th century and early 17th and was actually nicknamed Margot by her relatives and inner circle. Even to this day, she is mostly known as ''Queen Margot'' in France. That beind said, it's true that a lot of people nowadays name their child simply ''Margot''. I guess it happens in all languages, when nicknames become stand-alone names over time.
vote up1
Sure, it works! I adore Marguerite.
vote up2
I think it works but it also feels really deliberate and not natural. I might be biased because I don't like either name.
vote up1
I would just use Marguerite, I hate Margot, too close to maggot
vote up2
They're both very pretty names, and Margot is pretty familiar to most people; I know two of them.
But in the US, Margot is nearly always a stand-alone name, so while Margot for Marguerite is logical for French speakers, it does seem a bit like trying too hard here. It naturally kind of raises the question "If you were going to call her Margot anyhow, why not skip the messy middle step and just name her Margot?" Same deal with Elizabeth and Lisa, or William and Liam.
vote up3