New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Is it wrong to give your baby a tribal name if you're not from that tribe?
in reply to a message by Apozanolotl
You are both married to J? Why would he be upset over an Aztec name if the child is his with Aztec descent?
Replies
OP is a troll. I was going to write out all the discrepancies myself, but I didn't want to use the brain power, so instead I fed their posts into AI and had it write them out for me. God bless modern technology.
“Overview: The Poster’s Fabricated Polyamorous "Fundamentalist" Marriage
The original poster (OP) presents a series of highly contradictory claims about being part of a polyamorous "Fundamentalist" marriage. The narrative includes multiple inconsistencies related to relationships, pregnancies, and sexual activity. These contradictions, along with cultural inaccuracies, suggest that OP is fabricating the story to provoke reactions. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the discrepancies, with initials for the characters: "J," "K," "R," and "Z."
---
1. Timeline of Relationships and Children:
OP claims that she and her husband "J" met in high school, began dating in 10th grade, and married after graduation. Five years later, "J" married "K" after four months of dating. OP also says that "J" and "K" had four children by the time they got married, which is impossible due to the time constraints involved. The story lacks coherence in terms of how long they’ve been together and how many children they have.
Additionally, OP introduces a third wife, "R," in only one post, where she mentions that "J" has two children with "R." However, "R" is completely absent from the rest of OP’s narrative. Typically, OP frames the polygamous dynamic as involving just herself and "K" as the co-wives. The introduction of "R" feels like an afterthought and is not woven into the rest of the story, raising questions about whether this character is a real part of the narrative.
---
2. Geographical and Cultural Discrepancies:
OP makes several geographical mistakes while claiming Aztec descent. For instance, she says that the Aztec people come from northern Mexico, which is geographically incorrect—the Aztecs lived in central Mexico, particularly around modern-day Mexico City. This major error suggests a superficial understanding of the cultural heritage OP is trying to portray.
“Overview: The Poster’s Fabricated Polyamorous "Fundamentalist" Marriage
The original poster (OP) presents a series of highly contradictory claims about being part of a polyamorous "Fundamentalist" marriage. The narrative includes multiple inconsistencies related to relationships, pregnancies, and sexual activity. These contradictions, along with cultural inaccuracies, suggest that OP is fabricating the story to provoke reactions. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the discrepancies, with initials for the characters: "J," "K," "R," and "Z."
---
1. Timeline of Relationships and Children:
OP claims that she and her husband "J" met in high school, began dating in 10th grade, and married after graduation. Five years later, "J" married "K" after four months of dating. OP also says that "J" and "K" had four children by the time they got married, which is impossible due to the time constraints involved. The story lacks coherence in terms of how long they’ve been together and how many children they have.
Additionally, OP introduces a third wife, "R," in only one post, where she mentions that "J" has two children with "R." However, "R" is completely absent from the rest of OP’s narrative. Typically, OP frames the polygamous dynamic as involving just herself and "K" as the co-wives. The introduction of "R" feels like an afterthought and is not woven into the rest of the story, raising questions about whether this character is a real part of the narrative.
---
2. Geographical and Cultural Discrepancies:
OP makes several geographical mistakes while claiming Aztec descent. For instance, she says that the Aztec people come from northern Mexico, which is geographically incorrect—the Aztecs lived in central Mexico, particularly around modern-day Mexico City. This major error suggests a superficial understanding of the cultural heritage OP is trying to portray.
This is brilliant. 😂
yes. OP just needs to be herself. it's a whole lot easier and I bet it would feel much better than all this lying.
Ooof, I gave a genuine response to this poster and now I do feel like I've been feeding a troll.
Good troll-hunting, but I will say be careful with your points about '3. Inconsistent Relationship Dynamics', for example, a partner wanting to "open" a relationship (e.g. cheat) and becoming hostile and agressive when their partner meets other people and has more success in the "open" relationship is actually pretty common in some (in my opinion) unhealthy relationships. 'Inconsistant dynamics' like that could also be indicative of an abusive situation. Your other points still stand undisputed, but a partner "opening" a relationship and then becoming physically abusive when they feel "cheated on" is unfortunately far from the least believable part of this. Whilst this is probably a creative writing exercise by a very bored person, I do think we've gotta be aware that being dismissive of 'inconsistant relationship dynamics' could prevent people in genuinely difficult relationships asking for support because they feel they might not be believed. (I feel obliged to say that on the odd chance anyone reading this IS in an abusive situation, please do reach out for support as people will believe you and support you and help you out of the situation you are in. If this OP is just a troll, the use of a DV "storyline" is sadly unoriginal and just unbelievably low and scummy)
Also no sex during pregnancy is sadly a thing some people genuinely believe. Most people get rubbish sex ed. I grew up in the UK (better sex ed than the US but still not great) and I knew guys who thought women were straight on haemorrhaging for a week when we got our periods ("how do you bleed for a week and not die?"), that we can hold our periods in, and that we pee and bleed from the same place...so... thinking no sex during pregnancy does not really read troll or satire to me, it could (not in this case with everything added up) just be faulty education.
Good troll-hunting, but I will say be careful with your points about '3. Inconsistent Relationship Dynamics', for example, a partner wanting to "open" a relationship (e.g. cheat) and becoming hostile and agressive when their partner meets other people and has more success in the "open" relationship is actually pretty common in some (in my opinion) unhealthy relationships. 'Inconsistant dynamics' like that could also be indicative of an abusive situation. Your other points still stand undisputed, but a partner "opening" a relationship and then becoming physically abusive when they feel "cheated on" is unfortunately far from the least believable part of this. Whilst this is probably a creative writing exercise by a very bored person, I do think we've gotta be aware that being dismissive of 'inconsistant relationship dynamics' could prevent people in genuinely difficult relationships asking for support because they feel they might not be believed. (I feel obliged to say that on the odd chance anyone reading this IS in an abusive situation, please do reach out for support as people will believe you and support you and help you out of the situation you are in. If this OP is just a troll, the use of a DV "storyline" is sadly unoriginal and just unbelievably low and scummy)
Also no sex during pregnancy is sadly a thing some people genuinely believe. Most people get rubbish sex ed. I grew up in the UK (better sex ed than the US but still not great) and I knew guys who thought women were straight on haemorrhaging for a week when we got our periods ("how do you bleed for a week and not die?"), that we can hold our periods in, and that we pee and bleed from the same place...so... thinking no sex during pregnancy does not really read troll or satire to me, it could (not in this case with everything added up) just be faulty education.
You make valid points. I will only add that though people can falsely believe pregnant women can't engage in intimacy, OP had previously written contradictory statements concerning pregnency intimacy involvement and beliefs.
Right on!