View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Why are you replying to yourself?
oops the i do have twins as a name was an accident...you were being so rude thats wy I did it...I know several sets of twins that are perfectly fine with close names
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

If you can't handle negative opinions...you shouldn't ask what people online think. Because we will tell you. I would tell you this in person, too. I wasn't being rude; I was being honest. And I am a twin with a close name, and I don't like it. You shared your personal experience, and I shared mine, and neither is better or more correct than the other. But unlike you, I'm able to observe it, digest it, and reply to it in a mature way by taking responsibility for my words by posting them as myself. Assuming another identity to back yourself up is lame. Besides, "I do have twins" isn't what we're talking about. You post as Tabatha in response to your original post.
What are the convulsions of a city in comparison with the insurrections of the soul?
Man is a depth still greater than the people.
vote up1
I was just stating that I accidently did that and did want ya'll jumping on me again...I have seen both sides of the fence too...might I ask what you and your twins names are?...my twins middle names are actually family names (my moms and sisters middle names) so if they seemed spelled wrong it isn't my fault
vote up1
Jen and Jess. That's not nearly as close as Jessy and Jazzy, but it was still terribly annoying. To being with, people tend to call twins "whichever one you are" so multiply that by people going "Jen... Jess... Jens?" Now, insert "Jessy? Jazzy? Jezzy?"And we wouldn't have "jumped on you" if you would have read the rules before posting in the first place!
What are the convulsions of a city in comparison with the insurrections of the soul?
Man is a depth still greater than the people.

This message was edited 7/22/2006, 2:08 AM

vote up1