Names
Introduction
Browse Surnames
Advanced Search
Most Common
Namesakes
Submitted Surnames
Interact
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Tools
Meanings
First Name Site
Place Name Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
First Name Site
Place Name Site
Introduction
Browse Surnames
Advanced Search
Most Common
Namesakes
Submitted Surnames
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Meanings
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
All Messages
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
This is a reply within a larger thread:
view the whole thread
[Facts] Re: can't Harry be a pet form of Harold? i always thought that n/t
by
Andy
(guest)
9/8/2004, 2:51 AM
in reply to
a message by Menke
I think, this is what everybody thinks. At least I did until I found out that it is not used that way, but only for
Henry
.
Andy
;—)
Reply
1
Replies
Full-text replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
-
Domhnall
(guest)
9/8/2004, 1:10 PM
Harry
&
Hal
are both used as pet forms of
Harold
sometimes.
But when either is used as a given name (not a pet or nickname), the connection is usually assumed to be
Henry
.
Reply
1