View Message

Charles or Carl?
Which do you prefer for a boy? Tell me why if you can.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Charles...Carl sounds redneckish although one of my best friends in high school was Patrick Carl
vote up1
I don't really care for either, however, I'd go with Charles here because Charlie is such a cute nn and Carl sounds quite harsh.
vote up1
Neither actuallyI hate Charles (I think Prince Charles ruined it for me), but I love Charlie.I find Carl harsh and abrupt, but I love Carlo or Karlo.So all in all I'd have to say Carlo for me wins.
vote up1
Carl.Or Karl, if I have that option, too.Charles is growing on me, but I think I prefer how flexible Carl/Karl is; it can be regal or down-to-earth, whereas Charles just strikes me as the former.

This message was edited 6/29/2009, 1:28 AM

vote up1
Carl. I hate Charles!
vote up1
Charles nn CharlieI'd say it's probably because Charlie is cute on a baby/ kid and either Charles or Charlie works on a man.
vote up1
I prefer Carl. I like how Charles allows for the nickname Charlie, but I'm not really a fan of it. I think it's an okay name though. I just like Charlie a lot better than Charles.
vote up1
Wow I hate Carl. Someone said Charles was dated and ugly, that's the way I feel about Carl. It reminds me of hurl (slang for vomiting) and snarl. I can't see how Charles would ever be considered dated, it's been around for ever, I can't think of one decade it's dated to! Charles is a royal name that has been used by kings, from tons of different countries. Also, in the Middle Ages, Carl was used as a nickname for a villain, or a person of low birth and rude manners. Yuck.Charles is amazingly handsome. It's classic, classy, and Charlie is just about the cutest nickname ever.
vote up1
Charles
vote up1
Charles, because it's more formal, but Carl is cool too...nice and nerdy.
vote up1
CharlesI hate Carl. It sounds really comical to me.
vote up1
CharlesI think Karl is better with a K. Carl seems too stale.

This message was edited 6/26/2009, 1:08 PM

vote up1
Carl!Carl is such a classic, regal name. I just like how it sounds. Compared to Carl Charles seems soft and bland.
vote up1
CarlCharles is dated and sounds ugly..
vote up1
Wow, if you don't mind me asking, but is Charles dated? To what decade? If anything, Carl seems way more dated, whereas Charles has always seen constant use, in every country from royalty to common men, Carl basically came out of nowhere, peaked in the 1910's and then disappeared pretty fast!
vote up1
Nikki's in Sweden, I believe.
vote up1
Yes, and isn't Karl a royal name there? I think there were many kings named Karl (or a combo with it), so it hardly came out of nowhere.

This message was edited 6/27/2009, 6:11 AM

vote up1
Charles!
vote up1
I prefer Charles, though Carl is just as handsome.
vote up1
Carl...though I prefer Karl. I like the simplicity and strength of it. Bonus is that it's a family name and I'm a fan of Karl Urban.
vote up1
Charles...classic, strong, Charlie...
vote up1
Ditto!
vote up1
Charles. Carl is a variant and Charles is the root name; that's why I prefer Charles. Plus, it'a very handsome name with almost endless nn possibilities to fit the boy and the man (Chuck, Chucky, Charlie, Chock).
vote up1
ActuallyKarl is the root name. Small point. :)
vote up1
Ah.
vote up1
CarlI don't like Charles anymore. I can't tell you why. I have no clue. Carl is calm, grounded, unpretentious, wise, approachable, ancient. I don't like to admit that my opinion is colored by good associations, but I do think I would like it better on its own.Besides, whenever my taste will permit, I like to prefer less-fashionable things; Charles is kind of In, especially in England; Carl's out. That appeals to me. Call me hip.
vote up1
Thanx, hip!I can see your point. I am thinking about it.
vote up1
haha. yw. :)
vote up1
Charles!Charles is so handsome, but also adorable for a little boy. Carl sounds dated and makes me think of semi-creepy middle-aged men. :/
vote up1
LOL, totally agree here.......also, ain't nothin' cuter than the name Charlie!!
vote up1
ditto
vote up1
Well, as long as they're only semi-creepy! ;)
I tend to prefer Charles too, but Carl is the actual family name my DH wants to honor and I'm not sure I can totally sway him. Perhaps it's time to revive Carl and give it another chance? I am interested in everyone's feedback.
vote up1
Oh, if it's the actual family name, that gives it about fifty more points in my book. Direct honoring is so much better than indirect honoring, IMO.
I... definitely think it deserves a shot, if you can be swayed. :)
vote up1
Total agreement!
vote up1
CarlIf I make myself, I can picture Carl as a debonaire Viking. That's much better. Yes, I shall think of it in that way.

This message was edited 6/26/2009, 11:31 AM

vote up1
wholeheartedly agree -a
vote up1