View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Peyton....(eta)
I agree with Andromache, sorry.I'm so sick of surnames as fns. If they come from your own family tree, then I see the point. But otherwise it is just another plastic, trendoid, dime-a-dozen name. I just don't see it wearing well over time.Sorry I couldn't be more up-beat. Isabella is nice, if overly used right now. For what it's worth "Peyton Isabella" flows nicely.Could you elaborate more on why you like Peyton for a girl? I'd like to know. Is it the idea of a more masculine sounding name on a girl that you like? Is it just the sound of it, or something else that I'm missing?ETA: Years ago, before I started doing these boards, I toyed with the idea of Kinsella for a girl. So I do get the attraction of other people's surnames, sometimes. And I still love Cameron for a boy. It's just seeing the overwhelming number of surnames used right now that bugs me. They are all starting to sound alike to me. (I just wanted to confess that.)

This message was edited 9/29/2008, 4:19 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I can totally see where you're coming from, though I guess I just happen to like surnamey names... Although, this is the only one I like for a girl, most of my surnamey names are boys (ie. I love Jamison & Sullivan...)As for why I like Peyton, I couldn't really say... I guess I just like the sound of it. I think it's interesting that you find it very masculine though, both my partner and myself think that's its quite feminine and thus we'd never use it on a boy. Generally speaking - I can't stand masculine names on girls!

This message was edited 9/29/2008, 5:35 PM

vote up1
I'm so sick of surnames as fns. If they come from your own family tree, then I see the point. But otherwise it is just another plastic, trendoid, dime-a-dozen name. I just don't see it wearing well over time.I totally agree with this. "Plastic" is a good word for it. :-)
vote up1