View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: I have a question of my own...
But the dynamics aren't the same. There's a huge difference between a minority culture picking up a name used by the dominant group, and a dominant group co-opting a name used by an oft-repressed minority.The concept of Cohen is deeply significant to a lot of Jewish people, and I think many would be uncomfortable with members of another ethno-religious group using it. If they're doing it in ignorance it highlights how little they care about others' traditions; and if they're doing it deliberately it's an insult to the importance placed on the Cohen tradition.Also, I wouldn't call my son Cohen any more than I'd call him Priest, King, Earl, Duke, etc. It's presumptuous, claiming an honour that is not his.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Wasn't earl used quite a lot in past generations? I know quite a few in their 60's
vote up1
Yes, but I personally find it embarrassingly aspirational :)
vote up1