Message: "Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger"

Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger

by Marc (guest)

12/9/2012, 8:20 AM

As I suspected, you have absolutely no evidence for any of this. Onomastics is not a guessing game and you should refrain from indulging in this kind of idle speculation. You're not doing your credibility any good with the kinds of unsubstantiated claims you keep putting forth.

Messages

Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Getb · 12/3/2012, 12:23 AM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Marc · 12/3/2012, 9:19 AM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Getb · 12/5/2012, 8:24 PM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Charls · 12/7/2012, 4:20 PM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Marc · 12/8/2012, 8:06 AM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Charls · 12/8/2012, 6:39 PM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Marc · 12/9/2012, 8:20 AM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Charls · 12/11/2012, 6:26 PM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Charls · 12/8/2012, 6:53 PM

•Re: Horkheimer and Rimensberger · Getb · 12/9/2012, 11:58 PM

View Message

Messages