New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] You left
in reply to a message by Amber Christine
Because you posted an incredibly racist e-mail that basically called for the eridcation of all Muslims. We called you on it, and you left.
Siri
Siri
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
ummmm..not me??
You have the wrong person....I'm not racist and Ilove all people...really youhave the wrong person and I didn't post under my full name then either.....maybe someone needs to get ther facts straight???
I am actually on a team to help out muslims live in the US, with my church, that I am on staff with...
Hummm maybe another case of assuming someone is what YOU think they are without getting to know them....
You have the wrong person....I'm not racist and Ilove all people...really youhave the wrong person and I didn't post under my full name then either.....maybe someone needs to get ther facts straight???
I am actually on a team to help out muslims live in the US, with my church, that I am on staff with...
Hummm maybe another case of assuming someone is what YOU think they are without getting to know them....
1
Reality check, AMBERLYN . . .
Your IP Addresses both trace back to the University of Arizona, and then there's this:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/arcview.php?id=41736&board=baby
It was deceptive to come back as "Amber Christine" when you had an established profile under "Amberlyn" . . . no doubt due to the manner of your exit:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/arcview.php?id=75732&board=ot
And the post that caused it:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/arcview.php?id=75054&board=ot
You know perfectly well that it is against the rules to post under more than one name.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Your IP Addresses both trace back to the University of Arizona, and then there's this:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/arcview.php?id=41736&board=baby
It was deceptive to come back as "Amber Christine" when you had an established profile under "Amberlyn" . . . no doubt due to the manner of your exit:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/arcview.php?id=75732&board=ot
And the post that caused it:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/arcview.php?id=75054&board=ot
You know perfectly well that it is against the rules to post under more than one name.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
1
Amberlyn / Amber Christine / whoever you are, I'm mildly surprised at you (though perhaps I shouldn't be, after re-reading your old posts...). You were been extraordinarily offensive and intolerant in the past and didn't apologise for it, and now you come back and seemingly play off some our members' forgetfulness and our other members' newness to subtly re-intergrate yourself back into our community?
Yes, we're forgetful sometimes and some of us may be new, but one of us will always eventually figure out what's going on; you were quite foolish imo to come here again and deliberately break the rules by posting under more than one posting name without telling us... but perhaps you were more foolish to draw attention to yourself in the first place by being stubborn and immature, for you probably could've kept the charade going a little longer if you hadn't thrown mini-temper tantrums over your beloved Makenzie.
I doubt people here will forgive you, for you already burned most of your bridges way back in September 2004. And the few remaining bridges left have now been burnt through your deliberate act of lying through deceit. I'm reporting this to Mike C., mostly for the MPDism involved, but also for your behaviour here. That's all the action I'm going to take for now, but I'll continue to watch for developments if need be.
Miranda
Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
Yes, we're forgetful sometimes and some of us may be new, but one of us will always eventually figure out what's going on; you were quite foolish imo to come here again and deliberately break the rules by posting under more than one posting name without telling us... but perhaps you were more foolish to draw attention to yourself in the first place by being stubborn and immature, for you probably could've kept the charade going a little longer if you hadn't thrown mini-temper tantrums over your beloved Makenzie.
I doubt people here will forgive you, for you already burned most of your bridges way back in September 2004. And the few remaining bridges left have now been burnt through your deliberate act of lying through deceit. I'm reporting this to Mike C., mostly for the MPDism involved, but also for your behaviour here. That's all the action I'm going to take for now, but I'll continue to watch for developments if need be.
Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
1