View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] I have a question of my own...
Is a non-Jewish person calling their child Cohen worse than a non-Christian calling their child Christian or Jesus? I feel like only the most uptight of Jewish people would have a problem with non-Jewish people using the name Cohen.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

But the dynamics aren't the same. There's a huge difference between a minority culture picking up a name used by the dominant group, and a dominant group co-opting a name used by an oft-repressed minority.The concept of Cohen is deeply significant to a lot of Jewish people, and I think many would be uncomfortable with members of another ethno-religious group using it. If they're doing it in ignorance it highlights how little they care about others' traditions; and if they're doing it deliberately it's an insult to the importance placed on the Cohen tradition.Also, I wouldn't call my son Cohen any more than I'd call him Priest, King, Earl, Duke, etc. It's presumptuous, claiming an honour that is not his.
vote up1
Wasn't earl used quite a lot in past generations? I know quite a few in their 60's
vote up1
Yes, but I personally find it embarrassingly aspirational :)
vote up1
I am a Christian(the religion), and I have met non-Christians who used the name Christian for their son. I found it a little ironic, but not offensive. Christian is a popular enough name that people could get away with it. Jesus isn't as popular. I've met people named Jesus, but they were all Christians (the religion). I don't find it especially offensive, but more so than Christian (the name) if you aren't a Christian (the religion). I hope that isn't too confusing.
vote up1
I feel like only the most uptight of Jewish people would have a problem with non-Jewish people using the name Cohen.Very rude of you. Your "feel like" is based on basically nothing.

This message was edited 11/1/2013, 12:00 PM

vote up1