View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: I dislike both (m)
Thats fair enough. I don't like the nn Joe and I would actively discourage it on a child called Jonah or Jonas. I feel like it isn't quite such an inevitable nn as it would be on a child called Joseph, or is that really naive, lol? Any reasons as to why it seems 'whiny' or just a feeling? Thanks for your input.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

No, it's not inevitable. None of the Jonahs I've known have ever been Joe, and all the Josephs have.
vote up1
That makes me feel a bit better! Did they go by any other nicknames?
vote up1
A little historyJonas is the Greek form of Jonah used in the New Testament, so both names have the same history/meaning. Biblically, Jonah was a Jewish prophet who God sent to evangelize the people of Ninevah. The people of Ninevah were despised, and Jonah refused to minister to them, and took a ship headed to another city. There was a storm and Jonah told the crew to throw him into the sea to save themselves. After Jonah is thrown into the sea, the storm subsides and a fish swallows Jonah. Jonah stays in the belly of the fish for three days until the fish vomits him up on the land. Jonah then (still unwillingly) goes to the people of Ninevah and many repent. It is also mentioned that Jonah would rest under a fig tree for the shade, and God sent a worm to kill the fig tree. The fig tree died and Jonah mourned the loss of the tree. God then asks Jonah why he mourned for the loss of a tree but did not care for the loss of people (those in Ninevah).So, Jonah was a prophet, but he is remembered for rebelling against God, reluctance to obey, and being callously self-centered. So this may be where the "whiny" comes from.
vote up1
Nope, just from people I know. I'm not a fan of Biblical names either, though. They're not really my thing.
vote up1