I don't have a problem with private nicknames used only by family and only until the child objects. I think they become uncomfortable just naturally as a kid gets verbal. I'm not criticizing them for referring to the unborn baby as Jiblet - I know it feels weird to think of ways to refer to a baby before it's born. I'm criticizing the idea of actually naming a person that, though. I thought that is what you meant when you said "she decided she really liked the sound of it" - that she was thinking she was going to name the baby that.
And since I was APPALLED I TELL YOU, SO APPALLED, I misread the question about names lending themselves to the nickname and thought the question was about nicknames based on that name that would "disguise" it. oops
But still ... it's like she's naming the baby in honor of it being "Jiblet" instead of naming it as a person. They can call the kid Jiblet casually no matter what they name him/her! It's not a real nickname! It's just a pet-name. Like, it's fine to address someone as Dear or Sweetie or McMuffin no matter what their name is. I called one of my kids Bean and the other Tater for the first five or so years of their lives, and it had nothing to do with anything at all.
It's fine to make a pet name that plays on their real name, like calling someone named
Sabina "Bean" or
Taylor "Tater," but I think it's weird to decide you want to call someone "Bean" affectionately and then choose their real name to be
Sabina *because* you want to call her "Bean" ... Just call her Bean if you want! Nobody else will get it, and that's OK ... I don't think they should turn her name into an excuse to call her Jiblet. She's going to outgrow it.
answering the question anyway
Gabriel /
GabrielaGiselleJillianJacob Shelby
- mirfakThis message was edited 12/29/2023, 4:28 PM